Review by Toby Lattimore

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Spectacular Spider Man 2012

Usually a remake happens after the memory of the first film has faded but when a storyline is prematurely resurrected it’s potentially going to make heads turn for the wrong reasons. Director Marc Webb’s 2012 version of the Amazing Spider-Man appeared from the shadows and caught everybody unawares and the trailers seemed to strangely promote its similarities to the first. Peter Parker played by Andrew Garfield experiences the spider bite that makes him the cheeky superhero and much of his transformation is similar to what has been previously seen. But the main storyline is very different to the original and the marketing material seems to have problematically overlooked this.

In many ways Garfield’s Peter Parker is weak, his emotional attachments seemed fudged and confused at times, which is compounded by the poor script and the annoying habit that the writers have of making him wordless when he really needs to say something.

The Police Captain Stacy and father of Spiderman’s love interest is excellently played by the gruff Denis Leary. His serious approach is very appropriate given the setting and his sincerity in duty is convincing.

The effects are also impressive and the years between this version and the last has definitely benefitted this newer film. But having said that the design of the characters is predictable when this second coming could be the chance to add something different. Loyalty to the original comic is potentially the reason why this was sacrificed?

At the core of this remake is a story which draws on many predecessors and benefits. Classics such as Doctor Jackal and Mister Hyde and then more trashy 80s and 90s scientist-turned-freak motion pictures such as Darkman. This new Spiderman sits between these two the Lizard and the Scientist and the Student and the Mutant and delivers an exciting although at times frustrating blockbuster.

64/100

Visit Toby’s Blog at www.tobyreviews.blogspot.co.uk/ or tweet him @TobyReviews

3 comments

  • * 9 out of 10

    Report this comment

    Ronit Mukherjee

    Sunday, February 17, 2013

  • * typo : * 910 not 910 . Lol :D

    Report this comment

    Ronit Mukherjee

    Sunday, February 17, 2013

  • you sure you reviewed the DVD of the movie and not the movie itself ? And that too, giving just 64 points out of 100 ? Are you kidding me here ? I don't understand that why are people finding it so damn hard to just simply accept the fact that this movie was the Better spiderman Movie than Spiderman (2002) ? I mean how hard is that ? I am not a fanboy trying to defend a movie as I grew up with the Raimi trilogy and simply loved them (except EMO-Man 3)..of course.this movie too had a couple of plot holes, but other than that, this movie was nothing but PERFECT, it had a good rigid storyline, non-cheesy script, excellent acting( kudos to Garfield), uber Realistic CGI, not the meanest, but a good and smart Villian who looked absolutely flawless( yes I missed his snout but still, does the trick :) and last but not the least intense ACTION !!! this movie is really gripping, leaves you begging for more...all in All .. 910 anytime, Best Spiderman movie \m can't wait for the Sequel, it's gonna kick a#% too :D

    Report this comment

    Ronit Mukherjee

    Sunday, February 17, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
Weddingsite

Click here to read more of our digital publications
Book my advert Fenland Enterprise Buisness Awards March Town United Paper delivery enquiries

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT