Costs award as Fenland Council criticised for wrongly refusing homes plan
COSTS have been awarded against Fenland Council after its planning committee was found guilty by a Government inspector of “unreasonable behaviour” in rejecting a scheme for ten houses in March.
Government inspector Richard High has granted developers Grosvenor Partnerships “full awards of costs” following their successful appeal to be allowed to build the homes in Queen Street Close.
Mr High said officers had recommended the scheme for approval but the committee resolved to refuse the application.
While this was clearly within the council’s rights, he said, they still had to show reasonable grounds for taking a contrary decision and produce evidence at appeal to support that decision.
He said the reasons put forward “lacked any specific explanation of how the design and layout are deficient” – one reason put forward by councillors for refusal.
Mr High was also not happy the council had described the homes as “unimaginative and bland” since they offered no explanation as to why this conclusion had been reached.
In his judgement Mr High said the evidence presented by the council was unsupported by any objective analysis “and provides no clear guidance as to the specific aspects of the scheme which led to the council’s decision.
- 1 Police 'increasingly concerned' for man missing since early hours yesterday
- 2 Three rail and bus strikes in London and the East this week
- 3 Man, 28, dies after truck and lorries crash on A47
- 4 Product sold at Tesco recalled due to risk of disease-causing bacteria
- 5 Unauthorised encampments across Cambs a 'tricky issue' says Police and Crime Commissioner
- 6 Two combine harvesters catch fire in under 12 hours
- 7 Andre Rieu brings new summer concert to Cambridgeshire cinemas
- 8 £150,000 splashpad to open in Wisbech
- 9 NHS staff praised for ‘virtually eliminating’ long waiting times
- 10 Discount store expanding making it ‘bigger and better for customers’
“Indeed there is an element of contradiction as the reason for refusal refers to overdevelopment whereas the appeal statement refers only to design.
“As a result of the local planning authority’s failure to clearly justify its reasons for refusing the application, the appellant has incurred the costs of making an appeal.”
Mr High has now ordered Fenland Council to settle with Grosvenor.