Fenland farmer told he can’t demolish cottage and build new home
- Credit: Archant
A WIMBLINGTON man has been refused permission to demolish a derelict cottage on his land and build a home in its place.
Andrew Coward, of Yorkes Farm, Block Fen Drove, Wimblington, hoped to build a four bedroom two storey house with a garage and stables but his appeal was rejected by Fenland District Council.
The application dates from August last year and was initially rejected the following month.
The cottage stands on a site which was lived in for more than 80 years but has been empty since the 1970s.
Only its outer walls and chimneystack remain standing.
You may also want to watch:
Mr Coward said building has always been a home and that the damage was caused by theft and vandalism.
But, the inspector said she was confident the building had been abandoned.
- 1 'Loving, caring family man' dies in hospital weeks after A141 crash
- 2 Work to improve A47 between March and Peterborough begins
- 3 7 of the best pumpkin picking locations in Cambridgeshire
- 4 Butcher Ron to hang up his hat after 64 years
- 5 Police pursuit of suspected hare coursers ends in success
- 6 Dramatic pictures catch harvester on fire in 4am blaze
- 7 Paramedics warn of 'tents in car parks' amid mental health crisis
- 8 Illegal poachers stopped in their tracks by eagle-eyed public
- 9 Granddaughter launches bid to help others thanks to football legend
- 10 Board says Covid-19 figures are ‘stable’ at City hospital
She said: “In view of the present condition of the structure, the remains of the collapsed roof piled up inside, and the trees growing through the last remnants of the upper floor, there is no evidence of any recent intention to retain or use the building.
“I am satisfied that the residential use and the building itself have been abandoned.
“Since the site is remote from any employment, educational, shopping, health or other community services or social facilities and has no reasonably convenient access to public transport, and any occupiers would rely entirely for access on private transport, this undoubtedly is not a suitable location.”