Fence labelled as a “detriment to the area” allowed to stay by house in Whittlesey after planning appeal is won
- Credit: Archant
A planning appeal for a nearly two-metre high wooden fence by the side of a house in Whittlesey has been won after it was refused due to “visual intrusion.”
Retrospective planning permission was submitted for the 1.85m fence in Yarwells Headland in September last year.
The fence had been erected around the building to act as a “safe, unrestricted, securely fenced play area” for a child, planning documents stated.
However, planners at Fenland District Council refused the application on the grounds of it being “detriment of the character of the area.”
They stated: “The host dwelling is situated on a prominent corner plot and the proposal is located significantly beyond the existing building line, creating a visual intrusion which is dominant in the streetscene by virtue of its location, stark design and scale, to the detriment of the character of the area and contrary to the Fenland Local Plan.”
You may also want to watch:
Nine objections were received from residents.
Councillor Chris Boden also raised his concerns that the fence was “not only out of keeping but a real danger to traffic, to children on bicycles and to pedestrians.”
- 1 Caravan wedged under Fens rail bridge
- 2 Burglars led police to £170,000 cannabis factory
- 3 7 questions that could decide if you truly are from the Fens
- 4 HGV crashes into car damaged in earlier incident
- 5 Bid to ban ex- mayor running pub “a joke” says cabinet member
- 6 Wisbech to March light rail signalled in ‘levelling up’ bid by Mayor
- 7 Our archives reveal the 'crackpot' idea to re-open disused rail lines
- 8 Jaw-dropping stunts and traditional circus elements combine in unmissable show
- 9 See photos of the intricate final stages of the Huntingdon Viaduct removal
- 10 Man, 20, rapes woman as she slept, court told
Highways did not raise any objections.
But an appeal by the applicant Lorraine Daniels made in February stated that the fence had “no detrimental impact to properties adjacent or opposite.”
Miss Daniels won her appeal earlier this month.
The appeal decision issued by inspector, Claire Searson, now reads: “The main issue is the effect of the fence upon the character and appearance of the area.
“The fence has been erected and as such the application is retrospectively seeking consent.
“However, while the location of the boundary fence has changed, the positioning and nature of the plot is as such that any enclosure necessary in order to afford enjoyment of the rear/side private garden area would be prominent and visible.
“The height of the fence and its general appearance is typical of a modern domestic enclosure. Its prominence could also be softened by landscaping, details of which could reasonably be secured by condition.
“I also saw that there were a number of corner properties on the estate with built up side walls and fences and as such the scheme before me is consistent in this regard.
“Taking the above into consideration, on balance, I therefore find that there is no harm to the character and appearance of the area from the development.”