Rejected once but a year on Fenland Council set to agree nine homes off Elliott Road, March, despite objections from neighbours
- Credit: Archant
A bid to build nine homes that was rejected a year ago is now set for approval after builder Geoffrey Wilding amended his original plans.
Fenland District Council planning committee is being recommended to approve the homes for land west of 126-132 Elliott Road accessed from Peas Hill Road.
A report to next week’s planning committee says the original scheme was rejected “owing to lack of any planning obligation and insufficient evidence regarding biodiversity”.
But all that has changed say planners “and subject to a number of conditions” the application should win approval.
Mr Wilding has agreed to one home and a commuted sum being allocated for affordable housing.
You may also want to watch:
It will fly in the face of March Town Council who wanted the revised application rejected on the grounds of overdevelopment, flooding and traffic issues.
Eight residents will hear their objections considered by councillors; they fear loss of privacy, loss of value to their homes, increased traffic, drainage issues and overdevelopment.
- 1 Caravan wedged under Fens rail bridge
- 2 Burglars led police to £170,000 cannabis factory
- 3 7 questions that could decide if you truly are from the Fens
- 4 HGV crashes into car damaged in earlier incident
- 5 Bid to ban ex- mayor running pub “a joke” says cabinet member
- 6 Wisbech to March light rail signalled in ‘levelling up’ bid by Mayor
- 7 Our archives reveal the 'crackpot' idea to re-open disused rail lines
- 8 Jaw-dropping stunts and traditional circus elements combine in unmissable show
- 9 See photos of the intricate final stages of the Huntingdon Viaduct removal
- 10 Man, 20, rapes woman as she slept, court told
Neighbours will also argue the car park and turning is unacceptable and they also object to two-storey homes on the site.
Planning officers believe the new homes will have an “acceptable relationship to the neighbouring properties” and point out the highways authority has raised no objections.
However one issue that will need to be resolved is of the possibility of the site having “high archaeological potential” and so some investigation will be required.
But officers said the loss of property value “is not an issue which can be taken into account and as such is not a material planning consideration”.
Thirteen conditions are being recommended to be attached to the permission.